Next-Generation Antivirus
Stop tomorrow's threats today
Endpoint Controls
Securely manage the endpoint
Endpoint Detection & Response
Mitigate security threats before they cause harm
Mobile Threat Protection
Prevent & detect mobile threats
Deep Response
Advanced tools for investigation & remediation
MDR
Strengthen your security program
Mobile Endpoint Protection
Fully managed mobile threat defense
Remote Workforce Protection
Easy-to-install protection for remote employees
Incident Response
Comprehensive resolution to security incidents
Cyber Posture Assessment
Strengthen your security hygiene by closing gaps
Compromise Assessment
Uncover threats active in your environment
With the sudden increase in telework, the traditional approach of reacting to cyber threats and security issues only after a breach is discovered is no longer sufficient.
During the past few months, many companies have contacted us with various questions and requests about remote security. In our conversations with them, we’ve noticed four key challenges that we wanted to explore.
Security teams that have accepted the post-breach mindset focus on reducing risk as much as possible through visibility and automation, instead of searching for a one-size-fits-all solution.
Over the past year, we have seen many different types of ransomware attacks evolving, especially evolving into multistage ransomware that not only ransoms data, but also exfiltrates as much data as possible. This blog explores three of the most common modern ransomware attacks we are seeing today.
UbU (“you be you”) is the value that sits front and center at Cybereason. Acceptance of every person is at the heart of who we are as a company.
Earlier this year, Cybereason launched its latest honeypot to analyze the tactics, techniques, and procedures used by state-sponsored groups and cyber crime actors to target critical infrastructure providers.
In this article I describe a security strategy that helped my organization avoid this scenario by simply ignoring the perimeter, making us indifferent to the location our employees are working from.
Though AEPs are especially important when testing and building a strong defense, they are often overlooked for TTPs by security practitioners versed in the “trench warfare” of day-to-day security operations.
One could argue that, if you can detect all the TTPs in ATT&CK, you should also be able to defend against all of the adversaries in ATT&CK. While technically true, many TTPs are not inherently malicious.
IOCs are valuable when preventing known malware, but over 350,000 new strains of malware are detected every day, and fileless malware attacks are on the rise. IOCs are no longer an innovative or sufficient standalone method for defense.
